RSS

John 3 is Starting to Make Sense!… Sort of.

06 Dec

So while meditating on the Gospel of John, I’ve run into chapter 3. There is some weighty, powerful stuff in John 3. “God so loved the world…” Go think about that one for a few years. No, I’m serious.

However, as cool and significant as John 3 is, it has also been a bit intimidating to me for a long time. I would read it, scratch my head a little, feel a bit excited in my spirit, but not having a very clear idea of what was happening. One of the things that has perplexed me for awhile was Jesus’ seeming ADD throughout the conversation. Depending on how you read it, it can seem like He disregards Nicodemus’ questions entirely to preach about whatever happened to be in His head at the moment. I mean, right off the bat, Nicodemus gives Him a compliment, and Jesus returns the favor by stating that he can’t enter the kingdom of God yet.

However, a little adjustment in how I think of Nicodemus has changed all of that for me.

A lot of people aren’t quite sure what to do with this Pharisaical Rabbi. He comes to Jesus by night in a secretive, private meeting. Jesus tells him about being born again, and at the end of John, Nicodemus seems to be on Jesus’ side (John 19:39). So most people interpret Nicodemus’ actions as honest inquiries as to how he can be saved.

However, I do not think this is the most likely interpretation at all. When the Jews thought of a Messiah, they were not thinking in terms of salvation from sin. They were thinking in terms of deliverance from their physical, political oppressors. They weren’t looking for someone who would make atonement by His death; they were looking fo someone who would destroy Rome and reestablish Israel to her former glory, as in the days of Solomon.

In truth, they were not too far off with their expectation. We know for sure that Jesus is coming one day to establish His kingdom on the earth, and He will rule from Jerusalem. He will wage war against His enemies. But that wasn’t His goal at His first coming. The reason? …Well, His people were at enmity with Him at the time. It is His utter mercy that He did not set up the throne right then and there, or else He would have ended up with the most sparsely populated kingdom of all time.

Nearly all of the Jewish people in that day had no concept of their condition at all. If one was a born and bred Jew who made the right sacrifices and kept the right laws, then all was good. Right? Wrong.

Which brings us back to Nicodemus. Whether he was honestly searching, or perhaps trying to play a political game, he wasn’t expecting a message of salvation. He was expecting an action plan for world domination. His assertion that Jesus must be a man from God spoke of an underlying hope that this leader wouldn’t fail His mission like the previous so-called messiahs before Him. If He were sent from God — if He were truly the prophesied One — then this was it. This was the time the kingdom would be restored to Israel.

This explains Jesus’ immediate deviation from the topic. Nicodemus was asking about the physical kingdom, but Jesus knew the man would never see it in his current spiritual condition. Basically, Jesus’ response says, “No, you’re not going after the right question. This is not about whether or not I can score you a corner office in the Jewish capitol. This is about you getting right with God at the fundamental level. This is about you escaping eternal torment. This is about you doing what it takes to enter the kingdom.”

The idea of a new birth would have likely been much more feasible to Nicodemus, had Jesus been talking about salvation for the Gentiles. There was provision for foreigners to join themselves to Israel by undergoing circumcision and cleansing (an ancient form of baptism, actually). As the non-chosen people, Gentiles were expected to need a serious transformation in order to be accepted in the kingdom of God. Jews, on the other hand, were supposedly a shoo-in. After all, it was their kingdom.

And so Jesus continued to press the point of being born in the Spirit. Nicodemus needed a whole lot more than to simply be at the right place at the right time. He needed an inner transformation to make him right with the God whose kingdom was coming.

Reading the passage through this lens opens it up so much for me. There are two verses still tripping me up a bit, on which I would especially like to hear comments from you all:

3:8 “The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but cannot tell where it comes from and where it goes. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit.” (I have a couple of vague concepts for this one, but nothing very substantial.)

3:12 “If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?” (What “earthly things” came up in this passage??)

Hmmm….

Advertisements
 
7 Comments

Posted by on December 6, 2007 in Bible, Gospel of John, Theology

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

7 responses to “John 3 is Starting to Make Sense!… Sort of.

  1. brianbeattie

    December 7, 2007 at 2:03 pm

    I have memories of preacher/teacher folks disparaging the meteorological understanding of even the educated in this age – oh how mysterious is creation, but Jesus understands how it works because he made it! [end of lesson, next verse] I think this is a very superficial reading of 3:8, and totally misses the point of Jesus’ analogy.

    I think Jesus’ point was, the wind just is. It exhibits motion and power, a force that can refresh or overwhelm, but it doesn’t have a “from” or “to”. It is. This is another “I Am” moment in my opinion, and very exciting in my spirit – Jesus says we’re like that, or we will be when we’re free of this pesky restraint called time – or we already are, or something like that.

    You and I once participated in a discussion about predestination on Zack’s blog ( http://zackhensley.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/divine-election-pt-1/ ), and I’m feeling a tiny little bit more smugly vindicated in my view. 😉

     
  2. Amanda Beattie

    December 7, 2007 at 4:34 pm

    Hmm… I’ll think about that. I’m getting a little hung up though, on the fact that I don’t believe we’re ever going to “be free of this pesky restraint called time.” 😀

     
  3. brianbeattie

    December 9, 2007 at 9:06 pm

    I won’t try to drag you kicking and screaming into an eternity free of time, but I will call your attention to the final phrase of John 14:3 and ask you how constrained by sequential chronology Jesus would be…

    About John 3:12, I feel like Jesus was probably referring to Nicodemus’ general disbelief and learned objections, rather than the specific recorded content of this discussion. John 3:11 suggests a longer history of confrontation involving more than just Mr. Nic, and I have always assumed that the challenges by “the Jews” in chapter 2 were the same religious orthodoxy rather than the common folk. I think Jesus saw discomfort and conflict in Nicodemus, whose training and peer group loyality was on the block, resisting or complicating the truth. I don’t hear anger or bitterness in Jesus rebuke, but I think I sense the kind of bluntness that happens when reason, tact and diplomacy have been tried and failed.

    In His earthly ministry, Jesus was an embassy of Heaven on earth, and his ministry was full of eloquent expressions of the infinite in finite tangible terms – the kingdome of God is like a mustard seed for example. I would think that most of what Jesus said in ministry would fit under the description of “If I have told you earthly things …”

    Have you ever noticed how seldom the adjective “old” is applied to wind? Oops. sorry… 😉

     
  4. Amanda Beattie

    December 10, 2007 at 11:37 pm

    I’m not getting what the last phrase of John 14:3 has to do with constraint to chronology… can you explain that for me?

     
  5. brianbeattie

    December 11, 2007 at 9:22 am

    “… that where I am, there you may be also.” John 14:3 NKJV
    Jesus = God, God created time, God is above all created things, QED 😉

     
  6. Amanda Beattie

    December 11, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    We’re going to have to have a phone converastion sometime about my tentative theory on the time issue. 🙂

     
  7. brianbeattie

    December 12, 2007 at 9:51 am

    I am so looking forward to a telephone conversation where you can explain how wrong I am 🙄
    Let’s do it soon!

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: